Clinical Case1

Cautioned extraction to minimize peripheral damage.

Removal of peripheral alveolar inflammation.

Routine implant placement.

Checking the appropriate depth and then performing facile bone augmentation.(Place the fixture mount to prevent the bone material from falling into the implant fixture.)

Using BIOARK, then select appropriate length-1 mm below from marginal soft tissue. With enough endentulous space, BIOARK of usual size 1.5 larger than the fixture platform surface is used (If mesiodistal interference is to be seen, 1 size smaller BIOARK s

Removing the suture after 1 week. Switching to healing abutment after bone regeneration and soft tissue healing.

Clinical Case2

Peri-implantitis induced bone fracture. Vertical bone augmentation is performed with BIOARK. Even with the exposure of significant proportion of implant fixture and the relatively small pro-portion of implant placed in the bone, utilizing BIOARK presents excellent regeneration result

Clinical Case3

COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDIES I

Healing abutment VS BIOARK

COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDIES II

Titanium Mesh VS BIOARK

OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES I

BIOARK achieving primary stability with maxillary sinus augmentation(Scarce alveolar bone of 1 mm)

OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES II

BIOARK achieving primary stability with maxillary sinus augmentation (Scarce alveolar bone of 1 mm)

OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES III

Strong healing capacity with BIOARK

OTHER CLINICAL STUDIES IV

BIOARK and off-the-rack abutment (immediate placement)